Necesito argumentos a favor del maltrato animal para un debate por favor (aclaro que estoy a fabor del maltrato animal)?

Holiness"human.

(Theory of the domain.

A better re - interpretation)Tomás de Aquino, is another example of how the human being has been given too much importance, when, he says : "it is not important how behave men with animals, as Dios has subjected all things to the power of man (.

) "God is not asking accounts to man what it does with the oxen or other animales4.

" Again speaking "in the name of God".

Who told you that God, at one point, did not request accounts on what to do with animals?

It was divine inspiration perhaps?

, do you may think this as well, when the commandments States : you shall love your neighbor as yourself?

Should we talk about neighbor only as another human?

Could it be that neighbor covers everything that be that you share our world?

Do this?

To which leads us, as to what Peter Singer called "Theory of the domain".

Which, according to Peter Singer, is : "a point of view, not so much about the value of animal life, and the right of human beings to dispose of animal life when les conviene4.

" Says Singer : "the biblical account of creation must be rejected, and together with e, domain theory" 7.

I here I differ with him.

I think that the story and theory can coexist with man, provided a good reinterpretation of this becomes.

Animal mechanistic vision.

Renato Descartes, in his work "The discourse on the method" highlights a mechanistic about the animal posture, when he says : "animals are machines.

Their movements and sounds are not signals of greater consciousness that the movements and sounds of a clock ; certainly more complicated, but this was to be expected, since watches are machines made by humans, and animals are human.

"What distinguishes humans - he thought - is its possession of an immortal soul.

" This immortal soul, is he said, responsible for our feelings and mental experiences".

From this it follows that you for Des.